Desiree's note: Readers, you had to know I was going to talk about this. This sad individual and her anti-Desiree blog are technically old news but since I am typically slow on the upkeep of this blog and everything in the world of Michael Jackson, this still deserves an 'honorable mention'.
Some might wonder why, given the usual focus of this blog, I'd want to highlight yet more fan shenanigans. Why would I want to give them any shine?
Some might wonder why, given the usual focus of this blog, I'd want to highlight yet more fan shenanigans. Why would I want to give them any shine?
It's an understandable
question; after all, fanatics shape the Michael Jackson discussion,
rehashing tired and unconvincing public relations spin—the spin
that many of us have abandoned due to how many questions it leaves—as
a defense of Jackson's questionable conduct with young boys, always
shifting the onus of proving his guilt to his 'doubters'.
Because, as we know, if
we doubters cannot provide any evidence (or if this evidence, while
publicly available, was not allowed in during his trial) that beyond
a shadow of a doubt proves he was a pedophile child molester, it
means Michael Jackson is blameless and innocent, which is ludicrous.
Of course, if that is how
the game has to be played, so be it. Rational people know that
reasonable suspicion is often enough to 'convict' a party of certain
crimes, especially if the party in question (Michael Jackson)
displays certain characteristics that would be advantageous to
bringing about guilt.
But why should I muck up
'Desiree speaks...so listen...' by talking about these silly
fanatics? Shouldn’t I spend
more time refuting their talking points?
Yes,
and no.
This
site has numerous detractors given the perspective taken here (founded upon publicly available
information). Let's face it: most people who have a singular interest
in Jackson are fans; as such, they believe the sun shines out from
his anus. Because of my research and chats I've had with insiders, I
deviate a bit from that viewpoint, and it's safe to say that I do not
believe the sun shines out from Michael Jackson's anus.
This belief, again, founded upon evidence widely available to the public, has made this site a target for rabid Jackson fanatics.
I find the intellectual fascism and illogical hysterics of Michael Jackson's diehards absolutely atrocious, and, therefore, I believe their behavior should be displayed for the world to see.
I find the intellectual fascism and illogical hysterics of Michael Jackson's diehards absolutely atrocious, and, therefore, I believe their behavior should be displayed for the world to see.
Enter a 40-something-year-old, mother of two: Sabine Faustin.
Sabine is on the right, pictured with her teenaged daughter, Jacqueline. (**EDIT: This link is no longer available. Sabine Faustin has made this video private, as it should have been in the first place.)
This 40-something Jackson fanatic has earned a spotlight because her story is quite entertaining. But let's give a little background on Sabine first, who, I should mention, was very easy to find on the Internet, given her own self-congratulation.
This 40-something Jackson fanatic has earned a spotlight because her story is quite entertaining. But let's give a little background on Sabine first, who, I should mention, was very easy to find on the Internet, given her own self-congratulation.
According to her Blogger profile (which is no longer available publicly), Sabine hails from Brooklyn, New York, USA and is a writer. In fact, Sabine is actually an author of a children's book about her daughter called The Story of Jacqueline, published in November 2004. On the Amazon.com page for this title, Sabine provides more information about herself:
However, like for many Michael Jackson fans, there is always time for the King of Pop, jobs, children, or spouses be damned.
In addition to owning a blog that describes tons of personal information (**EDIT: This blog is now private, as Sabine Faustin no longer wants a link into her private thoughts.) about herself and one that simply adds to the clog of vindication sites dedicated to the typical talking point hash over while claiming to 'fact check' the 'haters', Sabine also maintains a popular site devoted to the type of Michael Jackson fanfiction that cause fangirls to cream their silks, called cobracrackcentral.com. (Read the about here.)
Sabine helpfully provides a 'warning' for her alleged hot fanfiction to unsuspecting fangirls.
To highlight a few points, she says of her stories:
Sabine is erotically obsessed with Michael Jackson, and her three-thousand or so "cobracrackheads" are, as well.
Joking aside, Sabine's fanfiction background is significant: she'd found this blog searching for "Michael Jackson fanfiction with black women". Unfortunately, Sabine didn't exactly get to my own (poorly-written) fanfiction between Michael Jackson and nanny Grace Rwaramba; she'd gotten to my posts.
Now, I can imagine stumbling upon the fact-laden content on this blog would send a fangirl's head into a tizzy. After all, if she believes Jackson to possess enough masculinity to cause 'Mikegasms', blog entries discussing the foreign male semen stains found on his mattress or those proving he'd molested 'special friends' (or, at least, attempted to) would, no doubt, cause a cognitive dissonance that could lead to rage.
This is exactly what happened with Sabine, and hell hath no fury like a fangirl scorned.
Sabine writes this on her Jackson blog, which illuminates what I'd fallen into when this woman found my Michael Jackson writings:
It is unknown what exactly set Sabine off. Was it the fact I was not speaking about Jackson with 'reverence'? Was it because she felt I was, in some way, writing a 'distorted, negative or inaccurate representation' of Jackson? Or was it that she simply disliked my content because it deviated from her own beliefs?
It is true: Michael Jackson is not written about with reverence on this blog; I do not know exactly how one could simultaneously discuss the circumstantial proofs that reasonably show he not only had a propensity for young boys but also most likely molested them and write about him with 'reverence', unless this blog was, perhaps, an off-shoot of NAMBLA.
And how am I to blame when she believes that the perspective of Jackson presented on this blog is somehow 'distorted' if my perspective is shaped by publicly available information?
Whatever caused Sabine to react--and, perhaps, my frosty repudiations of her Jackson fan talking points did not do much to soothe her rage--she reacted by opening a blog about me. This was no ordinary blog but one that used an identical blog title, template and background scheme, and included use of my photo as her Blogger profile avatar, complete with use of my name or variations of screen names I have used in the past.
A now-defunct Facebook profile was also opened under my name, but has since been reported and removed.
The rampant impersonation aside, Sabine's anti-Desiree blog is rather peculiar in that, despite the fact the content is what bothered her about my site, she has decided to take aim at me instead of the content. Astoundingly, she has decided to label me a 'malignant narcissist'--a somewhat hypothetical spawn of antisocial personality and narcissism--and someone who craves attention just because of the content on this blog she so despises.
The aforementioned is slightly ironic given that "self-congratulation" I remarked on earlier, something for which Sabine has an acute tendency.
Sabine's 'sofa psychiatry' is amusing; I admit that I am a rational personality type and tend to be clinical and aloof most of the time, even in real life--however this may be perceived I am ill-equip to explain. Perhaps this guides her irrational belief in my alleged narcissism; from the description of the INTP:
But all of this is ancillary to the point.
Like Jackson journalists Diane Dimond and Maureen Orth before me, I have been targeted because of my stance on Jackson. Sabine Faustin and, no doubt, other fans like her, cannot directly refute what has been reported on this blog, a point I've made repeatedly and one she rejects but, yet, has nothing to invalidate my position.
Sabine's tactic is one I've seen repeatedly. Because I believe there exists more than enough reasonable suspicion that Jackson was a child molester--and that suspicion is backed up by information I have linked to throughout my site--I must be personally invalidated in some way, in hopes that, by proxy, all my Jackson findings and writings will be invalidated as well. And I've been called everything from an 'ex mental patient' and your run-of the-mill 'hater', to a 'white male pedophile' and a child sexual abuse victim, the latter of which I have no idea why fans believe that to ever be an appropriate ad hominem attack, regardless if they believe any of Michael Jackson's boy victims are 'liars'!
All of this because fans do not want the full truth on Michael Jackson to be read by anyone and, worse still, be accepted by anyone.
In lieu of devoting her anti-Desiree blog to being the 'antidote', so to speak, to what I've written on the real 'Desiree speaks...so listen...', Sabine--a typical Jackson zealot--is doing nothing more than slinging mud.
Now, I should make note of something else for the sake of the complete case study of 40-something, mother of two Sabine Faustin; perhaps this may give some clue about why she's lashed out in such a fashion. Beyond my writings about Michael Jackson's proclivities for boys, I became the brunt of Sabine's ire when a comment of hers failed to publish on the site, simply because it was too long. She emailed me quickly afterward, delivering the same type of fan talking points we have all come to expect.
Note the length of her message. This, too, is significant.
While I will not attempt to psychoanalyze her as she has done with me, Sabine is very much an attention seeker; I would even add that she is conceited. She is also very much into self-congratulation, as I've mentioned previously. While researching this black woman, I discovered that she has a total of five websites connected to her name, four of which, in some, way, shape, or form, are platforms to either celebrate Sabine Faustin or showcase her own seeming intelligence.
(Look here, here, and here for examples with regard to her successful Michael Jackson fanfiction site, CobraCrackCentral.)
Given the self-congratulation and adulation she is used to, even though Sabine was upset about my talking 'bad' about her Michael, she was more upset that I did not find her opinion of value, mainly because it consisted of the tired fan talking points that have been rejected and refuted here on my site.
It seems extreme to open a website (and even a Facebook) about a private citizen who happens to maintain a small blog that has a comment character limit! But that says more about Sabine than anything else: how many Jackson fanatics would open a website because a comment failed to post?
Well, we can think of one other Jackson fan by the name of Lynette Anderson (note Sabine in the comments section as "D. Hill" during her Desiree impersonation stint).
So, what was the point of highlighting more fan insanity, besides just finding it pathetic and humorous? Had we not had our fill with Pauline J. Yarl?
Sabine Faustin deserved the spotlight because her brand of Desiree-caused, Jacko-inspired crazy led to the creation of an off-base, somewhat morally-repugnant hate site against me, simply because she did not agree with the direction here. The time Sabine spent making that site, she could been making more "cobracrack" to supply to strung-out fangirls around the globe. Instead, Sabine chose to not defend Michael Jackson by refuting my site, but to wax lyrical about my alleged supporting of pedophilia, my alleged use of strawmans, and my alleged malignant narcissism.
And about my alleged 'comment hypocrisy' that got her riled up in the first place.
To Sabine Faustin and all fans who read this site: if you disagree with me, you can refute me. If you think I'm a liar, you can refute my alleged falsehoods. If you think Michael Jackson should be discussed, on this blog, with the utmost respect and reverence, do explain why and make it good. All I have ever asked was for a legitimate exchange if someone happens to disagree with the court transcripts, documents, news stories, books, videos, etc. that I use on this blog in support of my assertions.
Sabine Faustin believes her imitative blog about me is 'critique', despite the fact she is not critiquing anything that has to do with this blog. She wants to critique me, and it seems as if that is all she can really do, which is not doing much of anything at all.
Maybe if she'd actually read my blog entries--something Sabine has never done and doubtless she will never do--she could attempt to do something besides what she is currently doing. After all, if she believes me to be slandering Michael Jackson with lies, twisting information to fit my worldview, and using fallacies to make my arguments cogent, reading those entries will allow her to fill her anti-Desiree blog with something of substance.
But, then again, no one likes the feeling of cognitive dissonance; even worse, she may find herself nodding in agreement.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Sabine Faustin is the 33 year old [now 40] mother of two children, Jaqueline (sic) and Christian, who are the featured characters in her newest publication. As the mother of an autistic child, she recognizes the need for books that are inspirational, eye-catching and educational.With two children, you'd think Sabine would have her hands full!
In "The Story of Jacqueline", she has created exciting characters that everyone will love to read about. We get to meet, Christian, an autistic boy who has a lot in common with most "pesky little brothers", and Jacqueline, his perky big sister.
However, like for many Michael Jackson fans, there is always time for the King of Pop, jobs, children, or spouses be damned.
In addition to owning a blog that describes tons of personal information (**EDIT: This blog is now private, as Sabine Faustin no longer wants a link into her private thoughts.) about herself and one that simply adds to the clog of vindication sites dedicated to the typical talking point hash over while claiming to 'fact check' the 'haters', Sabine also maintains a popular site devoted to the type of Michael Jackson fanfiction that cause fangirls to cream their silks, called cobracrackcentral.com. (Read the about here.)
Sabine helpfully provides a 'warning' for her alleged hot fanfiction to unsuspecting fangirls.
(click for bigger)
To highlight a few points, she says of her stories:
"At the very least you might experience a Mikegasm that will leave you unable to be satisfied by any other man in your lifetime."Ignoring the dubiousness of the aforementioned, she then adds,
"READER BEWARE!!!! 18 over, please, though age doesn't matter. It's not the adult content that's going to get you, it's the force of MICHAEL! CobraCrackCentral® is not liable for any failed tests, lost jobs or broken relationships. Married women are at particular risk."Sabine outlines potential adverse reactions that may accompany one's 'Mikegasm':
"COMMON SIDE EFFECTS:I imagine most readers are in the throes of laughter at this point, given the silliness of these so-called 'side effects' (which are simply precursors to rounds of masturbation); however, the fact Michael Jackson causes an "insatiable demand for sex" is one of the reasons most fangirls are dedicated to him. We all know that if a man can give a woman an orgasm--or, in this case, a 'Mikegasm' given to a fangirl by Michael Jackson through the writings of a middle-aged black woman--he has her in his back pocket.
- Reading stories over and over;
- referring to characters as if they are real people; ...
- insatiable demand for sex;
- inability to sleep or function due to an infection of the EXTREMELY contagious virus: OvahXspojer (staring at MJ pics for hours at a time and imagining yourself in the scenes from the stories)."
Sabine is erotically obsessed with Michael Jackson, and her three-thousand or so "cobracrackheads" are, as well.
Joking aside, Sabine's fanfiction background is significant: she'd found this blog searching for "Michael Jackson fanfiction with black women". Unfortunately, Sabine didn't exactly get to my own (poorly-written) fanfiction between Michael Jackson and nanny Grace Rwaramba; she'd gotten to my posts.
Now, I can imagine stumbling upon the fact-laden content on this blog would send a fangirl's head into a tizzy. After all, if she believes Jackson to possess enough masculinity to cause 'Mikegasms', blog entries discussing the foreign male semen stains found on his mattress or those proving he'd molested 'special friends' (or, at least, attempted to) would, no doubt, cause a cognitive dissonance that could lead to rage.
This is exactly what happened with Sabine, and hell hath no fury like a fangirl scorned.
Sabine writes this on her Jackson blog, which illuminates what I'd fallen into when this woman found my Michael Jackson writings:
"...it's my position that anyone who is afforded the opportunity and provided with the medium to write about Michael; anyone who has been gifted with the talent to garner an audience and then chooses to present a distorted, negative or inaccurate representation of Michael based on false conclusions, misconceptions and biased opinions is WRONG.Apparently, I didn't follow Sabine's rules and, little did I know, she would attempt to make me pay.
"...I challenge the people who love to focus on Michael's faults, real or imagined, those who judge him for the choices he made when he was alive, to put their life up for censure and see how it feels....
"...If I could be granted one further wish in regards to Michael, if the general public and the media can't at the very least make an effort to try and understand him, I wish people who choose to write about Michael would be mindful to represent him with reverence.... Anyone who will not discuss Michael with the utmost respect and consideration has earned a seat in the Michael Jackson Hall of Shame.
~ S"
It is unknown what exactly set Sabine off. Was it the fact I was not speaking about Jackson with 'reverence'? Was it because she felt I was, in some way, writing a 'distorted, negative or inaccurate representation' of Jackson? Or was it that she simply disliked my content because it deviated from her own beliefs?
It is true: Michael Jackson is not written about with reverence on this blog; I do not know exactly how one could simultaneously discuss the circumstantial proofs that reasonably show he not only had a propensity for young boys but also most likely molested them and write about him with 'reverence', unless this blog was, perhaps, an off-shoot of NAMBLA.
And how am I to blame when she believes that the perspective of Jackson presented on this blog is somehow 'distorted' if my perspective is shaped by publicly available information?
Whatever caused Sabine to react--and, perhaps, my frosty repudiations of her Jackson fan talking points did not do much to soothe her rage--she reacted by opening a blog about me. This was no ordinary blog but one that used an identical blog title, template and background scheme, and included use of my photo as her Blogger profile avatar, complete with use of my name or variations of screen names I have used in the past.
An old view of the blog; the new version is now identical to my new background; notice, too, that the photo, which oddly resembles Michael Jackson, is based upon the self-portrait I drew of myself.
The rampant impersonation aside, Sabine's anti-Desiree blog is rather peculiar in that, despite the fact the content is what bothered her about my site, she has decided to take aim at me instead of the content. Astoundingly, she has decided to label me a 'malignant narcissist'--a somewhat hypothetical spawn of antisocial personality and narcissism--and someone who craves attention just because of the content on this blog she so despises.
The aforementioned is slightly ironic given that "self-congratulation" I remarked on earlier, something for which Sabine has an acute tendency.
Sabine's 'sofa psychiatry' is amusing; I admit that I am a rational personality type and tend to be clinical and aloof most of the time, even in real life--however this may be perceived I am ill-equip to explain. Perhaps this guides her irrational belief in my alleged narcissism; from the description of the INTP:
Architects highly value intelligence, and can be impatient with people with less ability than they have. Architects often perceive themselves as being one of the few individuals capable of defining the ends a society must achieve and will often strive to find the most efficient means to accomplish their ends. This perspective can make Architects seem arrogant to others.The above also tends to explain my alleged name-calling when I am in the midst of destroying someone's argument.
But all of this is ancillary to the point.
Like Jackson journalists Diane Dimond and Maureen Orth before me, I have been targeted because of my stance on Jackson. Sabine Faustin and, no doubt, other fans like her, cannot directly refute what has been reported on this blog, a point I've made repeatedly and one she rejects but, yet, has nothing to invalidate my position.
Sabine's tactic is one I've seen repeatedly. Because I believe there exists more than enough reasonable suspicion that Jackson was a child molester--and that suspicion is backed up by information I have linked to throughout my site--I must be personally invalidated in some way, in hopes that, by proxy, all my Jackson findings and writings will be invalidated as well. And I've been called everything from an 'ex mental patient' and your run-of the-mill 'hater', to a 'white male pedophile' and a child sexual abuse victim, the latter of which I have no idea why fans believe that to ever be an appropriate ad hominem attack, regardless if they believe any of Michael Jackson's boy victims are 'liars'!
All of this because fans do not want the full truth on Michael Jackson to be read by anyone and, worse still, be accepted by anyone.
In lieu of devoting her anti-Desiree blog to being the 'antidote', so to speak, to what I've written on the real 'Desiree speaks...so listen...', Sabine--a typical Jackson zealot--is doing nothing more than slinging mud.
Now, I should make note of something else for the sake of the complete case study of 40-something, mother of two Sabine Faustin; perhaps this may give some clue about why she's lashed out in such a fashion. Beyond my writings about Michael Jackson's proclivities for boys, I became the brunt of Sabine's ire when a comment of hers failed to publish on the site, simply because it was too long. She emailed me quickly afterward, delivering the same type of fan talking points we have all come to expect.
Note the length of her message. This, too, is significant.
While I will not attempt to psychoanalyze her as she has done with me, Sabine is very much an attention seeker; I would even add that she is conceited. She is also very much into self-congratulation, as I've mentioned previously. While researching this black woman, I discovered that she has a total of five websites connected to her name, four of which, in some, way, shape, or form, are platforms to either celebrate Sabine Faustin or showcase her own seeming intelligence.
(Look here, here, and here for examples with regard to her successful Michael Jackson fanfiction site, CobraCrackCentral.)
Given the self-congratulation and adulation she is used to, even though Sabine was upset about my talking 'bad' about her Michael, she was more upset that I did not find her opinion of value, mainly because it consisted of the tired fan talking points that have been rejected and refuted here on my site.
It seems extreme to open a website (and even a Facebook) about a private citizen who happens to maintain a small blog that has a comment character limit! But that says more about Sabine than anything else: how many Jackson fanatics would open a website because a comment failed to post?
So, what was the point of highlighting more fan insanity, besides just finding it pathetic and humorous? Had we not had our fill with Pauline J. Yarl?
Sabine Faustin deserved the spotlight because her brand of Desiree-caused, Jacko-inspired crazy led to the creation of an off-base, somewhat morally-repugnant hate site against me, simply because she did not agree with the direction here. The time Sabine spent making that site, she could been making more "cobracrack" to supply to strung-out fangirls around the globe. Instead, Sabine chose to not defend Michael Jackson by refuting my site, but to wax lyrical about my alleged supporting of pedophilia, my alleged use of strawmans, and my alleged malignant narcissism.
And about my alleged 'comment hypocrisy' that got her riled up in the first place.
To Sabine Faustin and all fans who read this site: if you disagree with me, you can refute me. If you think I'm a liar, you can refute my alleged falsehoods. If you think Michael Jackson should be discussed, on this blog, with the utmost respect and reverence, do explain why and make it good. All I have ever asked was for a legitimate exchange if someone happens to disagree with the court transcripts, documents, news stories, books, videos, etc. that I use on this blog in support of my assertions.
Sabine Faustin believes her imitative blog about me is 'critique', despite the fact she is not critiquing anything that has to do with this blog. She wants to critique me, and it seems as if that is all she can really do, which is not doing much of anything at all.
Maybe if she'd actually read my blog entries--something Sabine has never done and doubtless she will never do--she could attempt to do something besides what she is currently doing. After all, if she believes me to be slandering Michael Jackson with lies, twisting information to fit my worldview, and using fallacies to make my arguments cogent, reading those entries will allow her to fill her anti-Desiree blog with something of substance.
But, then again, no one likes the feeling of cognitive dissonance; even worse, she may find herself nodding in agreement.
| NOTE TO FANS: |
|---|
| You are always free to (attempt to) refute me. However, do not be offended if I am not receptive to your viewpoint and make this known. Remember, I am just as researched as, or even more so than, the most ardent Michael Jackson defender. Let's debate the facts, not the talking points or the spin. |
69 comments:
You had me laughing the whole time! That she runs the Cobracrackhead site is totally indicative her mindset. I shudder at the thought of a fangirl in the throes of a "Mikegasm", LMAO. They are really deluded to imagine him in hetero situations.
So all of this over not being able to post a comment? did she read the part were it says that it won't post if it's too long? Apparently not. sounds to me that this woman needs an audience and it must have been a mortal blow to her ego when she thought she was "blocked".
The feedback message she sent was hilarious and very ironic, given her own blog statements. She says that you just want "drones" that agree with you and not "freethinkers". But isn't she the one that will not allow anyone to talk about Mike if it is not in reverence? What about the fact that she started a blog that was because you are presenting an alternate view to the "MJ was an angel" garbage? And how are we drones? There is a 1000:1 ration of fans to "haters", if any one is a drone gobbling up PR spin and believing the "smoke and mirrors" Mike peddled, it's them. I have to laugh at her lack of self awareness.
About your alleged narcissism, seems to me that it is she that is the narcissist. She only got mad because she believed her precious opinion about Mike was not heard, period. And why does she think that anyone cares about her kid? Why would you put all those pictures up on Youtube like anyone cares? I bet she thinks that since she's wonderful and that everyone should know about it, by extension, her kid is too because it came from her.
Curious is the fact that she has her name all over the Internet yet she will not disclose who she is one her DSSL facsimile blog. Surely she'd want all the f'loons to know she's taking one "Big Bad Desiree", LOL. I suspect she knows that what she is doing would not only reflect bad on her due to her adult age, but also that she internally knows that all she is doing his mudslinging, nothing more. Because that's what she's doing. Bashing you personally does not help Michael Jackson. This is not a hard concept.
Desiree you are an amazing writer, i have been reading your blogs for sometime now and what you wrote is mostly on point. Yes the fanatics are psychos and delusional weirdos like their idol. some of the words they use are sometimes out of this world like for instance, they would describe him as a sex god, that would probably make him cringe.
"I bet she thinks that since she's wonderful and that everyone should know about it, by extension, her kid is too because it came from her."
Those books on her spawns are self-published. http://goo.gl/BmN1I
I guess the poor dear couldn't find a publisher who recognized just how special her children are that they required their own books.
I have to say, I've read this entry at least five times already, and it keeps getting funnier. This woman belongs in a padded cell, not online obsessing over a college student and telling the world about her sexual fantasies for a noseless boy lover.
Dear Desiree,
I see you have followed the narcissistic pattern of scorch Earth revenge, and applied your defective detective skills to "outing" another focus of your narcissistic rage.
Once again, you're wrong. But it hardly matters, you will never admit it. Whatever you've written about Sabine, (I haven't bothered to read it, and I know she will not either) doesn't define her.
By the way, she's a beautiful woman, isn't she? Not the "dark skinned" girl you described, though there's nothing wrong with being dark skinned.
Will you admit to being wrong in that instance?
I doubt it.
Once again, these are just your baseless, biased opinions. It is why I haven't responded to your invitation to debate, because you don't want to debate, you just want a platform to spout more hate. Here you have done so again. How predictable.
There is nothing wrong with writing about love, romance, sex or finding a person attractive. There's nothing wrong with CobraCrackCentral (thanks for the advertisement, on her behalf). You too, have written your own fan fiction. Don't be a hypocrite, though I know you can't help yourself.
Sabine is a very talented writer and has a full life, whether you can acknowledge it or not. She has lots more coming up in the future, so please be patient, you'll have a lot more to hate on very soon.
Your problem is that you have lost your humanity. You have an inability to see Michael as a human being. You don't understand that everyone deserves respect and consideration, and that this has nothing to do with Michael's celebrity status.
Might I suggest you also block out Jacqueline's picture, the first one you posted. Children have very specific rights in terms of being exploited online; I see you did so in the other pictures, but you forgot one.
I suppose you don't see the total hypocrisy in that you have googled Sabine's information, and posted it on your blog, the same behavior you called "harassment" when it was done to you.
Because we understand that narcissists behave this way, hypocritically, dishonestly and without any sense of right or wrong, all of this was expected and does not come as a surprise.
I did notice that you've sunk so low as to mention Sabine's autistic son as some type of criticism. I mean, wow, you are really just a very hateful person to say such a thing. I shouldn't be surprised, but evil always surprises me.
Your desperate need for attention and for debate is not going to stop because it has been pointed out, that wasn't the point. Your need to be right won't stop. These are your issues that you will have to deal with and will only negatively impact your life and those unfortunately enough to have contact with you.
You're an evil person, Desiree. You are a liar, an instigator and a gossiper. Your behavior and writings here on this blog are toxic and wrong.
But in the end good will always triumph over evil, so carry on.
You keep being negative and we will keep on being positive.
Now lets watch magically as this looooooong post immediately posts to your blog.
Jessica:
"Curious is the fact that she has her name all over the Internet yet she will not disclose who she is one her DSSL facsimile blog. Surely she'd want all the f'loons to know she's taking one "Big Bad Desiree", LOL."
Sabine is very easy to find. She's left a trail of breadcrumbs throughout the maze of the Internet simply because she enjoys who she is. There is no fault in that, really, but it obviously caused her to go insane when I found her opinion lacking validity.
I really don't know why she is hiding her identity on the anti-Desiree blog. For someone who loves herself as much as Sabine does, and coupled with her show-boating MO throughout the Internet, it is a strange deviation.
Perhaps she does know what she's doing is wrong (which I doubt, honestly) or that she knows that other fans may think it's a little 'off'.
She should not have overreacted. I think it's immature. One of the things I find particularly annoying about fans (she's an example) is that when they come onto the blog and leave a comment disagreeing with me, they are usually, in some way, screaming in their posts, or lecturing. This typically causes me to react in a way that some may find mean.
I should be honest, though: I've barked at Lynette and Pauline because of my history with these two fans...
I do think blindly defending Jacko is stupid, given all the evidence out there against him, and I do question people's intelligence who think he's completely and without a doubt 'innocent'. But that is a personal thing; I simply ask fans not to spew the talking points when they come into my house.
Sabine had a deluded arrogance about her, and that offends me as a rational. I often wonder had I not fisked her first post in the way I did--and had she not went over the character limit in her comment--would she have still made a blog about me.
I just kind of think that it was about her ego, and it has nothing to do with Jacko at all, although she's obviously a f'loon.
She hides because she thinks it's funny and clever. Hell, I have no idea why she thought opening a mock Facebook trying to 'out me' was meaningful.
Okay, so she disagrees with me? Lynette opened a blog, too, although she closed it when she was exposed. All they want to do is complain about me, instead of engaging in substantive debate about the Jacko issues at hand. These ladies are two peas in a pod!
Beth:
Thanks for your compliments. I've always said that the one thing that bothers me most about the world of Jacko is the fans. He I can deal with; his supporters who pretend he was the Second Coming of Christ...? No, just no.
I think for many of us 'haters', it was fan behavior--while we were still fans--that caused us to drift over to the 'dark side'.
Of course Sabine is easy to find, she's a writer. Writers don't hide under a rock. They write for the masses. They publish books or articles, or create blogs just as you have chosen to do FOR THE PUBLIC.
I'm only back to address one of your fallacious tactics, which is very annoying.
You quoted the disclaimer on Sabine's site, as a way to ridicule her. You are always trying to use insults to discredit what a person is saying, but cherry picking the information that you use to backup your claims is particularly disingenuous.
On the page that Sabine created where she defines "CobraCrack" she specifically says:
"Here at CobraCrack, we respect Michael as a human being who lived amongst us, who was NOT perfect but also was not a God. We honor him for his virtues and we are honest about his flaws. We love him for his kindness and giving heart. We RESPECT him. We do not want to use him for our own pleasure. We do not worship him. We are celebrating his life and his contributions to the world." http://cobracrackcentral.com/what-is-cobracrack%E2%84%A2/
Your desire to lump her into a group of fanatical fans is dishonest. In fact, Sabine made her stories private on CobraCrack BECAUSE of fans that she found fanatical.
So pick another argument, why don't you.
And why don't you and Jessica talk to each other face to face. Is it because you so desperately need someone to bolster your shenanigans that she shows up immediately to cheer and champion you?
"Come on Jessica, leave a comment. Wait let me log out first." LOL!!!!!
Frenchie:
LMFAO @ that link! Does that not display typical Sabine? I'm sorry, let's just paste some of that you've found:
Subject: 'Ameeramac' needs you [Writers / Writer / Creative Writing]
My dear friends,
First of all, thank you all for welcoming me to this group. I am really glad that I joined.
Already, I have a request:
A very good member, who recently befriended me, is really feeling very depressed and advised me yesterday that she will be leaving this site.
She is a single mother of two children - a girl and a boy (who is Autistic). She recently self-published a children's book and sent info regarding same to members. Unfortunately, many were rude to her telling her not to send any more information to their port - can you believe that?
She is trying to be strong, but I know she is very unhappy and disappointed in the response to her book.
The next book she is planning to publish is about her son, and I know that with out help and prayers, she can succeed in her venture.
When I placed my order for her book, she told me that I was the only one.
Can you please...please...give her some hope?
As always,
Anna
*flatlines from laughter*
Sabine (screen name "Ameeramac") should keep in mind this maxim: no one cares about other people's kids! Likewise, the same can be said for other people's pets!
Like I mentioned in the entry, Sabine Faustin is used to self-congratulation because she loves herself. This is evident by her behavior on the Internet (did anyone read the fan history advertisement for CobraCrackCentral?). So, when she fails at it, it is no shock she feels defeatist. Again, recall the aforementioned maxim...
Is it just me or could she be the narcissist?
By the way, Frenchie, you are a super sleuth.
LOL @ Sabine--er--"Oopsies"--referring to herself in the third person.
She belongs in a mental home. I pity her.
OMG! You are such a liar! Wow, the mental illness is amazing when you come in contact with it. I really have you spinning, don't I?
Seems like you're having a psychotic break!!!
I know I shouldn't give you more narcissistic supply but where is the link for that supposed post you found, and how is it at all relevant?
If ANOTHER person posted a request that people support Sabine's book, that doesn't make anything that was said real, accurate or true.
And it still doesn't have anything to do with the blog that was made calling you out for the evil person that you are.
Thank you for showing everyone who you really are. This post and your comments, everything you are doing right now is showing your true nature.
Is anyone reading this able to think rationally?
Or are they your sock puppets?
You often claim that people are impersonating others; probably because you do that yourself.
Oh, by the way, accusing another of being a narcissist is the narcissist calling card. Amateur hour at best.
Of course Sabine loves herself, most healthy people do. They don't have a false self, like you do, that they pretend to love.
"No one cares about other people's kids!"
Spoken like a true narcissist. You can't speak for everyone. Those words come from your own hateful heart.
Oh, wait, I see the link now. I'm just skimming through the nonsense I apologize.
"Frenchie" uses the same URL shortener that you do? How convenient.
Once again, you rely on rumor and innuendo to bolster your biased opinion.
Just because fictitious "Anna" solicited buyers for Sabine's book back in September of 2004 (because sales are stagnate and stay the same and no one could have possibly bought the book in the eight years that have since passed); just because "Anna" was the only person who ordered her book; claims that she knows Sabine and that she and is privy to her feelings that makes it true, right?
According to Desiree faulty logic.
Like I've said Sabine has lots of experience with haters, people who are jealous of her talent and what she's accomplished; people who critique those who are doing, creating and accomplishing when they actually could be doing the same.
Like you do with Michael, because you are devoid of empathy; because you can only reflect and project the hatred that you have for your own self.
Would you like to show more proof that everything said on www.desireespeakssoolisten.blogspot.com is true?
You're doing a great job.
"no one cares about other people's kids!"
Michael Jackson would disagree!
Why this post again? Writer's duel?
Brenda:
"Why this post again? Writer's duel?"
What, you don't think this post is 'wonderful'? I thought it was actually pretty tame. No, it isn't a writer's duel; it's pointing out the silliness of a rabid Michael Jackson fan. And, to this, Sabine Faustin--who created the fake DSSL blog--reacted quite expectedly. This post will be eclipsed by another soon enough.
I call it my way of wiping my hands clean. Sabine's antics will not stop the flow of this Jackson-centered blog and the other website I am writing. Let me point out again: she reacted as expected, better than expected. But Sabine behaves like the true big-head that she is.
And, to think, all of this was over Michael Jackson...
Again, fan insanity.
LOL at Sabine leaving multiple comments under a post about her. All of a sudden she decides to grace us with her presence. And I love how she defends herself in the 3rd person.
Her comments are hilarious, and absolutely show that she is bananas. I'm actually speechless at the lack of non self-awareness she has about the ironic and hypocritical nature of the things she says.
Once again, you rely on rumor and innuendo to bolster your biased opinion.
Umm, sis, aren't you doing that on your DSSL facsimile blog? How do you not see that you are doing exactly what you claim Desiree's doing? You say she supported pedophilia--where is your proof to back up that claim?
It's funny that you mention "scorched Earth" revenge, and yet are you not the person that decided to make a blog with the same blog title, a nearly identical URL, the same background, and pictures of Desiree's art and herself so you could confuse anyone that googles her website because you were mad that she has an alternate view of Wacko Jacko and because (most importantly) your comments didn't publish?
Sounds like you are the one engaging in scorched earth revenge.
Just because fictitious "Anna" solicited buyers for Sabine's book back in September of 2004 (because sales are stagnate and stay the same and no one could have possibly bought the book in the eight years that have since passed); just because "Anna" was the only person who ordered her book; claims that she knows Sabine and that she and is privy to her feelings that makes it true, right?
Yes. LOL. And how ironic you say that Anna couldn't "know" your true feelings, and yet you feel you absolutely know Desiree's true feelings and her true nature--someone you don't even know. Isn't that funny?
You are too old to be acting like this; it's not that serious. Many people think Michael Jackson is guilty; just go on Topix. I'm just curious as to why you don't make a blog against "Wacko Facts", or anyone else who is anti-Wacko Jacko; Desiree must have been thoroughly convincing to you.
Seems like you're having a psychotic break!!!
Seems like you are. LOL.
Uh oh! There was less than a half hour between my last post and Jessica's! We must be the same people!
Maybe Sbibak is me, too!
Hey, Frenchie, even though the goo.gl service is open to hundreds of millions of people worldwide, since we both use it, you're just a figment of my imagination!
I guess I should switch to tinyurls. LOL.
Ahhh, now you're starting to see how ridiculous your assumptions are. You know, how you assumed that Lynette and Ace were one and the same based on circumstantial evidence and how you assume that Sabine authored the blog in question based on your defective detective skils.
Anyway, she doesn't mind. Your allegations doesn't = truth. You just don't seem to get that, and you're doing nothing but providing her with free advertisement.
What have you said anyway, that she is a f'loon and an obsessed fan? That's what you say to everyone who disagrees with you.
"In response to her inability to be critiqued or debated and this blog, she has written a new post, proposed to "out" the author of this blog as Sabine Faustin, and she has dedicated an entire post, full of pictures and links to various website and related pages to "prove" she is right.
One has to understand, to the narcissist being "revealed" as who they are is the WORST thing that they can think of. They have plenty to hide, and their self-hatred does not do well under scrutiny. Sabine is a published author and has no problem with free publicity, even from haters."
http://desireespeakssoolisten.blogspot.com/2011/09/desiree-hills-narcisistic-rage-part-ii.html
Your sister questions the basis for the conclusions drawn on the blog in question. We are analyzing your behavior and your words. You do nothing but name call, throw insults and try to obfuscate issues to get your point across.
No one but a gossiper, a liar and a person who enjoys negativity would support your writings.
If you really enjoyed debate you would just offer logical and sound reasoning as to why you're NOT a narcissist . . . which you are.
"Watch as Desiree deletes comments that she doesn't like. The comments appear on her blog, beneath her last comment and then POOOF, disappear! In the future she will claim the comments which posted, which she deleted, were actually sent directly to her spam folder:"
http://desireespeakssoolisten.blogspot.com/2011/09/desiree-hills-narcisistic-rage-part-ii.html
"Now if you go to the thread, the comment is back. I would post Desiree's IP address to show her activity on this site, how she logged on after searching for the blog on google, read this post, saw that I had captured the image of the comment appearing on her blog, and then rushed to put the comment back up but really I've had enough fun with her tonight."
http://desireespeakssoolisten.blogspot.com/2011/09/desiree-hills-narcisistic-rage-part-ii.html
What has Desiree proved, other than she cannot "engage intelligently in debate", that she must name call, insult, drag in personal information to try to discredit the source, cherry pick to support her claims or out and out lie?
Where is her rational, reasoned argument that she is NOT a narcissist?
Is her only response, you're just an obsessive f'loon?
Desiree, do you have anything of substance to to offer in response to the claim that you are a narcissist and just asking for narcissistic supply (attention) or does your only response consist of a long-winded, predictable, "nooo, you are narcissist!!!!"
dear desiree spouts and noone cares, i am not a person who loves child molestation and an trying to understand where you are going with this website, i want to know to what end are you trying to accomplish your goal of proving mj was a chester the molester. will you win some sort of award? what? im confused and trying to understand what is fueling you fire. the man is dead so he is no threat to anyone so why continue with this, if there are others who find him in a different light then yours then why condemn them, they are no more wrong than you think you are. because from what i have read on your website , links and all, you dont know what you are talking about , you are just a hater with nothing to do with you life obviously and accusing another writer of the same as what you are is redundant. so leave her be. are you a scorned love of michaels , you have a lot of venom toward a dead person. seems riduculous to me. your chipping away at michael jacksons legacy is futile at best so give it up. no one cares except the handful of ridiculous haters who happen by this website , that was apparent the day he died , did you see all the ppl, guess what that means , you are getting no where with this . so carry on lost soul, God may forgive you he always looks out for fools and children. good luck
Hmmm, another comment has disappeared. They disappear and reappear like magic in this place. Well, I've decided to bring this little lesson to a close. Desiree, you have learned your lesson, haven't you?
Your Pavlov Dog responses to the blog in question has been very entertaining. I think by now you understand exactly how the target of your blog might "feel".
We pulled your strings and girl, you did one hell of a dance! LOL!
"We subjected Desiree Hill to the exact same behavior she was engaging in so she could experience what that feels like and she illustrated, just as we knew she would, that she did not appreciate being the subject of scrutiny AT ALL."
http://desireespeakssoolisten.blogspot.com/2011/09/we-pulled-strings-and-desiree-hill.html
I thought Lynette's mental breakdown was pretty entertaining, but Sabine Faustin puts hers to shame. This is beautiful!
desiree why did u delete my comments? just because i do not like this post and i said what i think?
It's actually all pretty entertaining, isn't it? You can say the name as many times as you want "Frenchie" doesn't make any thing that you or any of the other narcissistic suppliers say valid, relevant or true.
I see that the mj fanatics have been going into a psychological fist over this site. Their delusions has no boundary, they are probably going to have a total meltdown. Everyone who doesn't write something fantastic about their idol is an hater,i really wonder how sane they are and the level of their IQ
I do hope Sabine Faustin's children, Christian and Jacqueline, never walk in on their mom during one of her midday "mikegasms". They'll never recover...
zeromarcy:
I deleted your comments because you left one liners like, "omg," and then one that said, "this post is childish."
Honestly, as someone from Vindicate MJ, I don't know why you read the site at all. You disagree with everything I say (although you've made no attempt to refute it); I'd think you'd want to save some energy by not reading.
I saved energy by not having to scroll past your comments.
If you want to complain about a post on fans, it'd be good for you to complain about Sabine Faustin's behavior... she got us all into this mess.
I have some LOLs to dole out:
LOL @ Sabine referring to herself in the third person. (I've mentioned this before.)
LOL @ Sabine's repetitive and obsessive comments at this post. Why not post under 'The Great Pretender'?
LOL @ Sabine asking me to prove I'm not a narcissist when, prima facie, she's yet to prove I am.
LOL @ "STROKER" aka 'desiree spouts again' complaining about this blog and claiming that he's read all the posts and the links.
Oh, and LOL @ Sabine still whining about the out-of-my-control Blogger spam folder that will siphon comments to it if long posts are in succession or if they repeatedly contain links.
Uh oh--Blogger should get a stern talking to for making Sabine Faustin mad! Grrr!
Oops! One more...
LMFAO @ Sabine advertising her blog on this site. Is that not so pathetic, or what? This is better than Lynette!
Oh and by the way: I have no problem with anyone showing my IP address or location or specs.
Have at. Couldn't care less.
Desiree enough with this nonsense. This whole post is a red herring.
You said, and I quote: "Elena:
"I think creating a blog about me is disgusting. Fanatics are truly vile."
So why are you special?
Why is your creating this blog and predominantly talking about Michael Jackson not vile?
Who wrote the blog is irrelevant. Obviously Sabine wrote the articles on the about page of the MichaelJacksonfactcheck.blogspot site. There are many articles linked there from many sources, but you've assumed she created the entire sites, both of them, because that is what you do. Assume.
But it is irrelevant who created the blog: www.desirrespeakssoolisten.blogspot.com, and if you claim it is relevant, than it also relevant who created THIS site.
It is relevant that you are a narcissist who is not at all interested in debate, dialogue or discussion but in only having people stroke your ego.
If it is delusional and fanatical that someone has created a blog about YOU than why is it not delusional and fanatical for you to have this blog where you do nothing but discuss a dead man's perceived faults and issues?
We have proved you are a narcissist by reviewing your comments and pointing to your behavior and showing how they exemplify narcissistic behavior, attitudes and thoughts.
Do you have any response?
If the responses here are repetitive and obsessive, then why is your ENTIRE BLOG where you repeat the same things over and over again not repetitive and obsessive?
Because you're smart and everyone else is dumb, right? That's how a narcissist thinks.
And why do your sock puppets keep mentioning Sabine and her children?
What on God's green Earth do her children have to do with this?
Yes, you are giving Sabine lots of shine. You've referred to her "popular", "entertaining" site and stories and have put up links showing how very talented of a writer she is. So what? Thank you on her behalf.
It has nothing do with how jacked up you are. Bottom line, we got you to dance to our tune.
You created this post because you couldn't stand to be criticized, but you think you are special and can criticize Michael Jackson without being challenged. How can you not see the hypocrisy in that?
And enough about the nonsense in terms of intelligent debate and being properly refuted. You obviously delete comments that don't reflect you in the light you wish. You insult and put down people solely because they don't agree with you.
Another proof that you're a narcissist. And your claims that "Sabine" got us all into this mess, please, give us a break. Because other people are responsible for your behavior?
We asked you to create this site, to take on an amateur job of silly sleuth and attempt to play detective, lawyer, judge and jury when you have zero experience in doing so.
I am posting here because I choose to, any other questions?
I will also capture the screen of this message after it posts just to show people how you delete comments.
All you can do is "lol" as if you don't care, but it is obvious by your actions how much you care. So ooops, you've been found out.
Posting pictures of a talented writer and pointing to her successful website, referring to her beautiful children and the many people who read and love her writings proves what exactly?
Nothing.
Lol@ Desiree pretending she doesn't care, when she went through the trouble of researching this post, when she already complained profusely about how she was being harassed and when she can't stop responding.
Lol@ Desiree's repetitive grade school insults: Pathetic, f'loon, obsessive, etc. Someone needs a good thesaurus.
Lol@ Desiree blaming others for her own behavior, classic narcissistic calling card.
Lol@ Desiree referring to a comment made on the blog about showing her i.p address and her visits to the blog she hates so much or could care less about, depending on what minute of the hour it is.
We know you can't stop responding; we know you can't stop coming by to visit; we know it's all just attention to you. Remember what you said: negative attention is just as good as positive attention.That, too, is a classic narcissistic trait.
We wave the bone and you come running because we got your number and know who you are. Hmm, let's see what will be the response to this post:
Will you:
a)Delete it
b)Name call, f'loon, ignorant -- you know which words you like
*chuckle*
LMAO. Our darling Sabine is still trying to save face even though her identity has been thoroughly verified. She's a determined little headcase, I'll give her that.
Now, whenever someone does a search for Sabine Faustin, they'll learn that she stalks, harasses, and impersonates college girls if they dare to bruise her delicate ego. I'm sure that will help her standing as a respectable children's book author. Wait, that's right, no one buys her books anyway. :-(
Frenchie:
I find her actually quite disturbing. When I wrote this post, I had no idea she'd come flying like a bat outta Hell.
But, I guess I can't really be too surprised.
To note, she's since removed her 'personal blog' (which is still viewable as a webcache--read the most recent post about her mother! I guess if Sabine doesn't like you, you'll get a write up! LOL).
http://goo.gl/gy8Bb
She's also made private the Youtube video about her daughter (which shouldn't have been a public video in the first place, IMO).
In short, Sabine is upset and Sabine is boring. I was considering closing these comments down because I'd like to get to other things--or at least enjoy my somewhat superfluous hiatus (which was interrupted, again, by Sabine Faustin). However, I realize it's somewhat of a morbid curiosity for we 'haters' to watch her self-destruct at a post that was actually pretty damned tame, so, I'll keep them open.
Her presence here is making me feel nauseous. It's not the responses--the first one ("Dear Desiree...") being my absolute favorite because it showed her attempting to calm her anger--it's the self-congratulation. I have zero opinion on her attractiveness or her talent as a writer (I've been privy to nothing but her screeds against me). However, she's doing very well filling the void my opinions could have filled.
I think it's time she bigs-up herself on her various websites...
"Why are you using my personal, copyrighted photos on this blog?
That's a violation of Blogger policy.
By the way, what you're doing here is exponentially worse than what I do on my website.
Michael Jackson is dead, he was rich, and he's a public figure, previously scrutinized in books, magazines, on TV, etc.
I'm a private figure and living. Pretending to be me and constantly harping on my first and last name and location, while you hide behind the Internet, is pretty deranged. . .
You'd know a lot more about stalking and harassment than I ever would. Writing about a celebrity is neither. WRITING ABOUT ME and pretending to be me definitely fills both nicely.
Again, refute what I write.
September 14, 2011 5:17 PM "
____________________
Hypocrite! who is the deranged on? Do you crazy chics actually think any one in the real world is going to care about who created the 2nd Desiree So Speaks Blog?
Desire and cronies, get over yourself. You're so unimportant in the grand scheme of things.
Desiree, Sabine can put up any pictures of her daughter that she wants, none of your business, but she doesn't want you obsessing over her daughter as you show pedophilia tendencies.
As for her personal blog, it was open to the public to learn and gain understanding.
You won't be getting any of that from it, but maybe someone else will. It will be open again, when you turn your narcissistic focus to someone else.
Sabine is so boring that you dedicated a whole post to her and you keep commenting.
Do you expect anyone with sense to believe that? You were so interested in her you searched her for HOURS.
Your opinion on Sabine counts for nothing Desiree. The fact that you got sooooooooooo upset when you were outed as the narcissist that you are is priceless.
Sabine:
I wasn't going to respond to you on my blog at all but--
Please, woman; just...stop. You're embarrassing yourself. No one cares anymore. For real. I don't care.
I have been diligent to not let your comments languish in the spam folder when they go there because your conniptions are the height of hilarity.
Yes, Sabine, when you opened the anti-Desiree blog, I thought it was funny. I was flattered. When you started intimating that I support pedophilia and using my copyrighted photos while pretending to be me, I was angry. And I've already said this.
Why was I angry?
Because what you were doing was overboard, an insane reaction to my difference of opinion on Jacko.
Think about it, really: I'm sure you'd find it totally repugnant for a neo-Nazi skinhead to write a blog--just like yours about me--personally bashing the writer of a site 'proving' that Adolf Hitler was a terrible person.
And to try to open a Facebook attempting to 'out' that anti-Hitler blogwriter?
If you think that analogy is out-of-this-world, it really isn't. There are people who adore history's miscreants and there are certainly Holocaust deniers. I believe this situation is identical to the one with you and me. I believe Jacko to be a molester and a pedophile; I'm putting the evidence--and it does exist--out there.
And you don't like it.
That you now have a problem with this post shows your incredible hypocrisy. I guess you could say it was a weird way of 'paying it forward'.
But it's boring now.
"Sabine is so boring that you dedicated a whole post to her and you keep commenting."
Sabine, do you not realize that this is my blog and I am entitled to write comments under any entry that I write? This is so ironic, given that you've devoted an entire blog to writing about me.
Seriously. Enough with the shenanigans. Please, return to writing Cobracrack and having 'Mikegasms'. Take care of your kids.
Don't go away angry, just go away.
"as you show pedophilia tendencies."
Wow, first I'm a sexual abuse victim and now I'm a pedophile for an average-looking black teen?
How about them apples...
@desiree: honestly i read whatever i want to read. and yes i posted two comments, that was the main reason why u deleted both of them?
just to let u know i read other blogs posts of people who do not agree with me, so where's the problem?
and u call MJ's fans obsessed and floons,and u can not accept someone who say the same thing (at least on that post) of u? if u have the right of calling people who u do not know,that name, the same people have the same right to do the same to you. I'll say once again: this post is childish,and it demonstrate some obsession even from u.
regarding sabine:if u believe she is obssessed, and u are more "intelligent" than her, u should not use ur time writing about her...but u did. And this is NOT an attack.
zeromarcy;
"that was the main reason why u deleted both of them?"
Yes, that was the reason I deleted them. As you can see, others were allowed to post against me; had you kept them together, as one comment, they'd probably still be on the page.
To note, though, posting comments on my blog is a privilege, not a right. I know Jacko fans--like you, like Sabine Faustin, like Lynette--are used to being able to rant everywhere Jacko is being discussed and that has developed within you a sense of entitlement.
Please relinquish that viewpoint.
"just to let u know i read other blogs posts of people who do not agree with me, so where's the problem?"
Terrific. The question is why do you waste your time.
"and u call MJ's fans obsessed and floons,and u can not accept someone who say the same thing (at least on that post) of u?"
Fan obsession is a whole different animal to what I'm doing here. Learn to differentiate. Yes, we both have an interest in Jacko, which is fine. However, you seem to find fault in the fact that I believe--and write about--him being a pedophile; that drives your calling me obsessed. I find that odd.
I also find it odd that you, like many fans, feel the need to read and attack a site like mine. To me, this is obsessional, simply because fans feel the need to obsess over everything about Jacko. To note, the only Jacko-related site I frequent is my own.
I don't have a problem with you calling me obsessed. But feel free to elaborate completely "how?" next time around. Otherwise, you seem like an upset f'loon.
"I'll say once again: this post is childish,and it demonstrate some obsession even from u."
Perhaps you don't know the meaning of the word. This post is a response to a detractor, nothing more. The post on Pauline was also a response to a detractor. I respond to detractors of my work.
If that is a fact you cannot comprehend, by all means, dwell in your confusion.
Sabine Faustin is a non-factor in my life. Unfortunately, given that she has devoted an entire site to me, I am not a non-factor in hers.
Oops.
"regarding sabine:if u believe she is obssessed"
And you do not? LOL!
"and u are more "intelligent" than her"
Yes, this seems to be true...
"u should not use ur time writing about her...but u did."
Your opinion has been noted. I can write about whoever I like within reason and it, in no way, invalidates the obvious fact that she is 'off' (if these comments left by her are not enough evidence already).
Again, this was a response to a detractor to the DSSL website. As you can see by my comments throughout the website, I always respond to detractors.
And then, it's over. Unfortunately for Sabine Faustin, she will not let it die.
"And this is NOT an attack."
I'm confused by what you mean regarding 'attack'. No, your comment was not an attack; you are entitled to your opinion. However, you are not entitled to express it here; remember, commenting on DSSL, as with any blog, is a privilege, not a right. If by 'attack' you are referring to this blog entry on Sabine Faustin--who graced us with her presence--you are also correct.
While conduct by her was mildly mocked, that was the extent of the attack.
The main point of it was that this is another fan who went crazy or acted without regard to intelligence just because they did not like what was written here.
And if you don't believe her entire site about me is 'childish', let alone her insinuating that, despite my obvious stance against Jacko's pedophilia, that I have 'pedophilia tendencies', you have a skewed notion and selective application of the word.
All of which is not a surprise.
Have a good one.
I didn't want to add more to this post but this is important about Sabine Faustin's atrocious behavior.
On her blog called "The Awakening" at http://celebratethetruth.blogspot.com (that she's since put on private since I linked it here), she wrote this about an experience that she'd had; this was written in Feb 2011 and shows a terrible hypocrisy on her part:
Excerpted from "Predators, Users, and the ones who push you away" (http://goo.gl/hBJze -- webcache),
" Early last year I started a new blog from scratch and began writing some fictional stories. Man, it started out as a blast. I was really enjoying feeling the creative juices flow, watching a plain canvas blossom into an entity of my own creation, first here on Blogger and then when Blogger became too small for all the ideas I had in my mind, I went ahead and created my own website and that's where the fun began!
In a way I'm being sarcastic. Even when I was on Blogger, being interested in group dynamics I was watching a weird phenomenon play out, where people came together and assumed their roles and also tried to enforce their roles on one another. I had already experienced the awful hostile take over, where a person I was loosly acquainted with decided my site was really her site. Ending my association with her resulted in months of cyber-bullying, and my having to chase down bogus sites that were made in my name, false accounts that were created using my name and emails that were sent out in my name.
The question that plagued me was why. Why had this person, because I no longer wanted to associate her, decided to bully and stalk me over the internet for almost a year? What kind of person has that much time and energy to devote to forcing a person who didn't want anything to do with her to pay her attention?
I can't say that I ever came to a firm conclusion. I know about Narcissists, I know about psychopaths/sociopaths. I've never met a narcissist who didn't exhibit sociopathic traits and I don't believe you can be a sociopath/psychopath and not be a narcissist. All of those labels describe a person lacking empathy, the ability to have compassion and put yourself in another person's shoes. This person and the people who she enlisted into her cause to make my life a living hell didn't care one bit how I felt or what I was going through; that was obvious."
Notice the language about narcissism, which proves she wrote the fake DSSL blog, something she'd been trying to deny in this comment thread.
(cont'd)
"...When I banned her, she refused to go. She logged onto the site using proxy servers and continued to try to get in for four hours. I view this behavior as similar to the behavior my stalker exhibited. Why wouldn't this person leave me alone?
Was it a fear of rejection/abandonment that made her say through words and actions: NO, YOU MAY NOT TELL ME TO GO AWAY?
Truthfully, I have yet to put my finger on it, because at the same time as I observed what was truly bizarre behavior to me, i.e. people that I have banned or told to go away continually trying to get on the site...."
Sabine, the other evening, did the SAME THING trying to get onto this site. She then used a proxy server and sent me an email, telling me the block didn't work and linking to a post she'd written on the fake DSSL blog about my being a pedophile.
"...I had disbanded the clique that was formed and banned some key members who were talking only amongst themselves about topics that THEY liked, and making it very uncomfortable for others with different ideas and thoughts to be heard. Amongst those others were myself. I could not comfortably express my ideas on my OWN SITE!!! Once I banned those key plays, others who were like them faded away. Those who could not stand to be disagreed with. Those who needed people to agree with them in order for them to feel validated in expressing an opinion."
Wow, the irony!
If she wrote this, how can she behave in such a despicable manner towards me? That would be an excellent question for 40-year-old mother-of-two, Sabine Faustin.
This was never about Jacko; this was about Sabine needing to be heard and how she would go to whatever lengths to make that happen.
why would yu lol at the fact that someone has read your ridiculous site and not comment up until know at how viscous you are to nonbelievers, i even went to that wacko facts site okay. i dont hate michael jackson okay just because you think you know something and you dont know ish doesnt give you the right to continue bashing and chipping away at a man he has done greater deeds than you could think of in you wildest dreams. im not a jackson fanatic. i read all the evidence and obviosly if you look at it with an open mind you might see there could be another reason for the stuff besides homo and pedo reasons. he did of course have others living in his home who worked for him. and he did see women although you refuse to believe that. listen even oj got off and you cant send him to jail and we alll know he was guilty. michael jackson was tried in a court of law and anyone who objected could have easily came forward and dispute the way the trial was going but nothing doing. and now you want to try a dead man. so hopeless. i dont much care if he was bi curios or looked at naked boys in art books he never touched any kid i know of so he's good to go as far as im concerned and beleive me there are a lot like me so you have a long road ahead of you trying to convince the world otherwise again good luck.
chipping away at a man he has done greater deeds than you could think of in you wildest dreams. im not a jackson fanatic.
LMAO, dude. These two thoughts don't go together if you want us to believe you are "neutral" about Michael Jackson.
you might see there could be another reason for the stuff besides homo and pedo reasons. he did of course have others living in his home who worked for him. and he did see women although you refuse to believe that AND i dont much care if he was bi curios or looked at naked boys in art books
LMAO. Again, these thoughts don't go together. so you're saying he's into women (no evidence of that) and then you say you don't care if he was bi curious and looked at naked boy books? Thank you for let everyone know that you are a fanatic and you would never see anything Mike did as wrong.
beleive me there are a lot like me
YIKES!
"This was never about Jacko; this was about Sabine needing to be heard and how she would go to whatever lengths to make that happen."
And it backfired. It's now been publicly exposed that Sabine Faustin of Brooklyn NY, a homely middle-aged mother and Michael Jackson erotica enthusiast, is apparently a mentally disturbed stalker who has gone to extreme (and potentially criminal) measures to attack and defame someone young enough to be her daughter. Through her own actions and behavior, she has ruined her reputation.
As you said, this entry was much tamer than it could have been. You just gave her enough rope, and she came here and did the rest.
Frenchie:
When I read that from her blog I was astounded, taken aback, actually. She says what she did on the fake DSSL blog is doing to me what I'm doing to Michael Jackson--which is a crock of bull; is she going to start a blog about Diane Dimond or Christopher Anderson, too?--but, in reality, she's taking a page from her own experience, something she found extremely intolerable, and doing it to someone else.
(Amazingly, she thinks I'm the hypocrite for doing it back to her, regardless of the tameness of this post. Talk about lack of self-reflection!)
I'm simply a researcher of Jacko. She disagrees with my focus and findings.
What she didn't like is allegedly not being able to say what she'd wanted to say. If you read her blog (and many pages and posts are easily readable and accessible as webcaches; read the one about her mother), she's very emotional and plays 'sofa psychiatrist' with everyone else feelings, blaming others (like her mother) for her problems and why she is the way she is.
It's amazing when 'off' people try to dole out advice.
No wonder she put it on private! It all well documents why she is the way she is!
Everything is 'through the looking glass' with her; she'd do well to look at the looking glass...
But the post I'd pasted... I'm still in shock she could behave identically. It's atrocious. Jacko is a public figure and he's dead; it's like blogging about Abraham Lincoln.
If she reads this (as I've unblocked her, hoping she'd be able to see the hypocrisy she's indulged in), I hope she sees a therapist.
I'm not bashing her; I think she should talk to someone. Self-help books, IMO, make people more deranged. Talk to a professional, Sabine!
Hey Desiree, my name is Louis. I'm sorry that I couldn't write a comment of substance (I wrote one lengthy comment, and yet accidentally deleted it), but I just wanted to say that I am a rational MJ fan. I mean, I may have written a paper discussing how Michael Jackson could have been trying to live a Emersonian way of life, yet I don't think he is God or anything like that. I don't really have a true opinion of the 1993 case since there is so much silence concerning information. Your site provided a treasure trove of info, and has helped my research (reading my horribly titled Victor Gutierrez book, and even have a copy of Boys Will Be Boys: Celebrating the Adventurous Spirit in Every Little Boy). Overall, I think Michael was one of the greatest entertainers to ever live (rivaling Elvis, The Beatles, and Queen) in terms of talent and fame. Yet, he could have had a devious side unknown to us. If he did, I will still be a fan of his music, just not the person. I find that a lot of fans try to make a symbol out of MJ because of his wholesome demenor, and his innocent view of life. I find these qualities to be great and have utilized these qualities to make me a better person, yet there are so many things that could be found wrong with Michael and his mindset. Overall, Thank you! :D
Hi Desiree
At first I found this post, and the comments, quite amusing; but as I read further into the comments I felt a sense of distaste. Contact, even through the written word, with MJ fanatics makes me feel dirty and full of despair. I can't believe these kinds of people exist. How can they truly believe, in their hearts, that MJ was kind and innocent, and never did anything wrong?
I suggest Sabine does some REAL research into Mike to find out what a REAL narcissist is. One only has to look at those horrendous paintings he commissioned to draw the obvious conclusion, never mention the rest of his behaviour.
Keep up the good work.
Alby:
Thank you for the kind words. The antidote to that woman's madness is to simply continue what I am doing here, regardless if she feels that I am somehow 'slandering' Michael Jackson--a public figure in history, in fact--by highlighting the news stories, passages in published books, court documents, court transcripts, and videos that seem to reasonably suggest that he'd lied to people about his sexual abuses of boys.
She has done nothing to refute the content of this site; she is in the business of diversion tactics.
I agree with you: I often feel unnerved when I communicate with Jacko fans, simply because I don't really understand why they cannot see that declaring him absolutely innocent (without even acknowledging the 50% probability of his guilt, since none of his boy victims have ever recanted) is an insult to not only his alleged victims, but to all sexual abuse victims who'd been molested or interfered with by some other 'beloved' individual that everyone 'believed' simply because of the molester's status.
Not to mention, I cannot understand why they do not accept, even just a small bit, the clear evidence showing that Michael Jackson pulled the wool over the public's eyes.
These people perplex me.
Sabine Faustin is embarrassing herself. She ought to be ignored. None of her slanderous rants diminish the credibility of the links to the truth that are supplied on this blog.
Pure and simple.
I'd like to see her go after Dimond, Anderson, Orth, Sneddon, etc. After all, much of the stuff on this site is identical to the evidences they've put out before me.
Desiree
The incredible thing is - fans would never, ever stick up for any other man who wanted to sleep with young boys, no matter who they were. Especially if that very same man had a collection of "art books" full of naked boys AND an original photo of a young boy in the nude in his possession.
One has to ask: Why make an exception for that one man? Answer: They believe the PR spin that MJ could pay for. No more, no less.
Speaking of the photos, Alby, have you seen this one from the copy of "Boys Will Be Boys" that I picked up?
Remember this is from the book that is 90% nude--the book is more graphic than "The Boy":
http://goo.gl/ziJfk
Perhaps you can show it to the f'loons on Topix. Let them explain why a man has a book with pictures like the above!
I should add that the photo linked above was one that Sabine Faustin didn't dare to look at; I can imagine why... If this site was enough to give her a grand conniption, that photo from a book Jacko'd lovingly inscribed may be enough to make her head explode.
That's assuming she knows how to consider the whole, rather than the sum of parts. I'm not so convinced.
Love the blog. Your points are always welcome on the MJ topix forum and I'm quite amused when the WackoGanda Cult rears it's ugly head. This woman, whoever she is, must be mentally unbalanced or she wouldn't put so much effort into emulating your blogging site with such detail. She must have been looking at your posts for quite some time now and has a genuine hatred against anything that brings up her fear that her precious Michael Jackson may have been
anything other than a saint.
What's so ironic about this is the wording "Malignant Narcissist" - describes Michael Jackson to a T, actually.
Desiree, I saw the contents of that book a long time ago on the Johnnie website. Johnnie is of course a habitué of the alt.fan.prettyboy Usenet group, a newsgroup dedicated to showcasing pictures of young boys just like these as well as stories about boylove. The regular posters there use language exactly like MJ used - e.g. "I would never harm a child". They are scum. https://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.prettyboy/topics?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&_done=%2Fgroup%2Falt.fan.prettyboy%2Ftopics%3Fhl%3Den%26ie%3DUTF-8 (Don't worry, viewing through Google Groups doesn't bring up any pics, just the text that accompanies it). This is an example of how your typical boylover thinks - https://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.prettyboy/msg/0476d984331f354d?hl=en - and I can just imagine Mike nodding enthusiastically and agreeing with everything said...
Alby:
It was on "Johnie's" website (and notice how he likes to put his names in quotation marks just like "Rhonda" in the copy given to Jacko back in 1983) that I got the pictures of "The Boy"--I saved them to my computer for a future showcase.
I imagine f'loons cannot see the connection between Jacko having a book boylovers like.
But the photo linked in my previous comment is not from "The Boy" but "Boys Will Be Boys", the one that is 90% nude.
I'd read on Johnie's website on the guestbook page someone asking if he could supply pictures of "Boys Will Be Boys", as well. BWBB had only 2 printings, whereas "The Boy" had about 4, I believe.
So, what I've shown is from BWBB--the rarer book Johnie does not have on his site--not TB.
Johnie has pedophile stories on his website and I cannot even read them through for long because they are so repulsive. However, if anyone has more curiosity than I have, they can read them. From what I had managed to digest was very illuminating as to their mindsets.
Some of the stories spout the same BS Jacko used to say. Many of those pedophiles have a 'saviour' complex, wherein they like to rescue boys from abusive situations, etc. There is also a bizarre fascination with bathing these boys, too, nursing them in a 'motherly' type way.
Let's be reminded that Jacko, according to Jordie, would put Vaseline on Brett Barnes's anus because Brett would tear from defecation (sure it was for that reason but for argument's sake, we'll stick with it). It's the same type of mindset.
There is a reason he seems so like them, not to mention owns items they own or want to see.
If he was not Michael Jackson, he'd be your average 'boylover' and the fans wouldn't dare defend him. As always, it's just because he's a celebrity. It isn't right.
Anon:
Please try to use a screen name next time; hell, be 'Bob' or 'Mary' or something... :-)
"This woman, whoever she is, must be mentally unbalanced or she wouldn't put so much effort into emulating your blogging site with such detail."
Sabine Faustin is mentally unbalanced. Healthy 40-year-old women with children don't harass, stalk, and slander 20-something-year-old girls for writing about their factually-supported and popularly accepted opinions about a man thrice-accused of child molestation.
For the record, she created the revenge site because she was upset I didn't care to listen to her Jacko apologetics. And I had made this known to her. That level of sensitivity can reasonably be concluded to reflect a mental pathology. She says I'm a narcissist... heh, her obsession with the condition--and she is obsessed with it (check the link to her personal blog)--is the oddest form of projection that I've ever seen.
It is as if she feels if she points it out in others (often baselessly and/or with terrible aim), she will be able to prevent it in herself. It's all a product of a neurosis.
I should mention that she is right in it being a terrible condition. Totally.
And you are right: 'malignant narcissism' is something that can be pointed in Michael Jackson's direction. All celebrities are narcissists. He was obsessed with looking at his record sales and hated Madonna just because her career survived Erotica and the 'Sex' book. That's a narcissist.
I should continually note that Sabine Faustin has not and probably will never refute the facts on this website that tend to reasonably suggest that Jacko was not only a pedophile but also a child molester.
I think Sabine Faustin needs a giant mirror. Her poor kids! :-(
Desiree
It's obvious to anyone that has actually done any real research into the way boylovers behave, their actions and their words that Mike was one too. The similarities are just too convincing.
Alby
I too am a long familiar poster to the pre www boards on NTTP format - predates our HTTP format.
I visited those places specifically because they couldn't bash themselves into my conversations. Bozobins are useful features at times. The rest,,, well, they got reasoned responses as long as I got respect back to my posts. If not.... buh bye- bozobin entrant. Newsreaders made great filters in those days and I didn't have to read a single goofball that now litters the alt.music.michael-jackson. forum. And yes, it's tedious to filter out the trolls from the real-interactive folks.
I don't use googlegroups, but a newsfeed, it works easier and filters out all nonsense.
Desiree and Alby,
I've always been quite interested in "out of norm" behaviours and physiology in general, I read a lot about those things. And I'm usually pretty neutral and always try to see things from all points of view etc...I've been looking through that "Johnie's" website you linked before. The first impression of course is how sick these guys are, but since I still like to study these kind of weird behaviours, it's also quite interesting to read what these guys think and feel from the inside, you know right from their perspective. I agree that they sound just like MJ, and you know what the funny thing is? If any of the f'loons saw that website and read any of those stories they post there, they would feel totally disgusted and call these guys perverted freaks. Even though most of them say things that MJ has said himself and they have defended pretty much with their life. LOL
Going through some of the boards I found this post:
http://www.cblf.org/messages/65013.htm
It's called "Exploring the painful parts of being a BL". Comparing this to what I know about MJ, I found a lot of similarities. It's interesting how he talks about his opinion on not only women, but the females in general. However he has a close female friend which he appreciates mainly because he can share anything with her. He also mentions his (not surprising) obsesion about absolutely anything relating to young boys, his constant observations about childhood, that relationship with a now gay adult (ex young friend) etc...Sounds like anyone we know?
I agree with Elena. The pedos that frequent "Johnie's" site are quite similar to Mike in a lot of ways, and it is interesting to hear from the horse's mouth how they see themselves. From all appearances they seems to be quite normal, besides the obvious perversion. I sort of feel sorry for them just for that reason, the way they are "hunted down" and made a monster by everyone, even though they are usually law-abiding citizens; you'd just hope they'd get help to stop liking kids, sheesh!
Their stories reveal a lot about how they think and possibly their abuse histories. We all have heard of an abused child potentially becoming an abuser themselves if they don't have treatment. In that regard, many of their stories feature incest, like with brothers or fathers. And of course all of it is viewed as consensual and is highly eroticised. Shows the possible mental warping that child abuse can do, and I think about how this could have played a role in Michael Jackson's pedophilia, since he was allegedly abused by businessmen, and a relative, according to Johnny Jackson. also something that stuck out to me is that they view themselves as homosexuals attracted to younger males, which would explain the way they try to attach themselves as an extreme wing of the LGBT movement, as per the "Chickenhawk" documentary.
Also, there seems to be a general attraction to children being children, not always kids in sexualized situations. This is highly similar to Mike, who said, for instance, that a boy's screaming in happiness is "romance". I think Mike followed the same trajectory and sexualized boyhood, the sleepovers, etc. I think like the rest of them, they came to somehow link childhood/children with sexuality, possibly as mentioned in their stories through exposures to sex when they were young.
Even though most of them say things that MJ has said himself and they have defended pretty much with their life. LOL
That's the irony. there's a reason that Carl Toms can with all confidence say that Michael Jackson was a pedophile because he is one too. It takes one to truly know one, and the fans fear the association, that's why they wanted Toms' book banned from Amazon. But if they'd only look, they'd see Mike for what he was and then they wouldn't have to spend so much time defending erroneous beliefs in his innocence, which make them look stupid.
About that link, Elena, the OP's feelings toward women and his young friends having girlfriends makes me think of Mike's "stop fishing" exhortation to Frank Cascio, and of course the fact that he didn't like him to bring girls to his house when he wasn't there. Remember the alleged pact he made Jordie say, "no wenches, bitches, heifers, or hos", and the fact he didn't want him to call girls? Sounds totally the same as that BL freak. I also found it ironic that the OP would say that the 13 year old boy father ruined his life because he couldn't resist the sex, and yet this same guy would be willing to ruin a 13 year old boy's life by trying to have sex with him... these people, SMH.
Fans seem to think that pedophiles are only men who grab children off the street and molest them, or men that molest every child that they see. Of course this has been discussed here before and when we are discussing Mike's pedophilia that is not the kind of person he was. If fans read some of these boylover thoughts and stories they would come to realise that Mike thought and acted exactly like them, and even used the same modus operandi - grooming boys and their families.
That parents trusted Mike so much must have made Mike so happy - it was his aim to get families to like and trust him so that he could get closer to his boys and have time alone with them. A lot of boylovers must study Mike's methods very carefully.
I've been lurking this blog from time to time. I don't want to give off this superior complex, but something seems 'off' about these fanatics. I too was lost at one point, but you have to do some mental gymnastics to be in that much denial. I actually read a comment where a stan dismisses the semen stains altogether. She didn't give a rebuttal, just gave a "that's not true". They are very sick, and I have no shame saying that because they aren't nice people anyway. Honestly, I felt like a fool to realize I've been lied to by MJ, but that feeling went away shortly. Stans need to move on with their life.
When I checked out topix, I noticed that Miky was weirdly fixated on Desiree so, for laughs, I trolled her. Apparently failed writer/cyberstalker extraordinaire, Sabine Faustin, thinks everyone from topix is Desiree (especially my troll--mjmymasturbation), so she devoted an entry to me to "prove" that Desiree's a narcissist. LMAO. If Sabine were any dumber she'd need to wear a helmet.
Frenchie:
Mikky is obsessed with me, too? My God... These people need lives! I don't know whether to laugh or be repulsed. I distinctly remember how she insisted that I was not black but 'white and full of hate'. LOL.
As for the black geriatric, she is truly sick and every time I am reminded that she has bred, my heart aches for her children. I don't spend time on Topix--in fact, I've only been there a few times--because I think the Topix Jacko forum is ridiculous. All anyone ever does is argue with each other; there is never a dialectical synthesis, an actual discussion of the overwhelming facts. The so-called 'haters' on there are not interested in convincing the Jacko f'loons beyond just wanting to 'win', when the focus should be about educating people so Michael Jackson, a pedophile, will no longer be heralded as somebody one should admire.
And, of course, I have nothing to do with Jacko's fans. I never realized that people would be so gung-ho about idolizing a child molester. I pay these people no mind. They are free to wallow in their fanaticism. I wish they would learn a bit of reciprocity and not stalk people they disagree with.
Sabine Faustin believes every person who comments on my blog or everyone who thinks she's batshit insane is me (what a paranoid world she must live in--it's easy to imagine many people must think she's insane). She will undoubtedly think that when I write to you here, I am talking to myself.
I still cannot imagine--fathom--why anyone would ever go up to 100, 200, 300 comments talking to themselves. I would have no problem having a blog no one comments on. In fact, it would take tremendous pressure off me.
What Sabine Faustin ought to do is step back from her computer, stroll around town to get the freshest air Brooklyn can manage, and take care of her kids. She's glued to the web because her real life is absolutely meaningless; through this virtual world, she is emboldened to act in ways she is too weak to act out in person. No one can see her and they are unaware of her pathetic existence. She is thus rendered invincible.
That was why, as these comments prove, she was very angry that her identity was exposed. In fact, all one had to do was follow the rat droppings: she wrote a Jacko vindication blog, which linked to the fake DSSL blog. And the former was listed on her profile page. No one knew the email address of 'Unbeatable' but, like many people, she has a handful of usernames she works with.
Again, the rat droppings led to the mother anus that was Sabine Faustin.
I truly believe she is mentally ill--all a doubter has to do is read her personal blog and they will be convinced. Hell, look at her eyes. Mikky is nutso about the eyes, too. Both women are in desperate need of sleep. If Sabine Faustin wants to spend time in front of a monitor, she should work on her writing. It is fucking awful.
I should mention that I find it incredibly sad that anyone would want to spend Christmas thinking about my website. I know I didn't. It'll be good when DSSL can float in cyberspace. Its effects seem to be out of my control! LOL.
Desiree and Frenchie
In their quest to crush all opposition to Wacko and to try and stifle all dissenting opinions, fanatics go after even the smallest and most humble blogs and websites. They aren't interested in free speech at all - in their world the facts Desiree presents can't be crushed so they try to crush the messenger. They do the same to James Hudnall, Kurt Loder, Aaron Carter and anybody else who merely tells things as they are/were.
BTW, am I you too, Desiree? LOL
What makes this all the more amusing is that, amid my trolling, I posted a photo on topix so it's quite clear to anyone with an ounce of intelligence that I'm not even the correct ethnicity. Great detective work, Sabine Faustin!
By the way, Lynette Anderson had another one of her meltdowns. She was on topix today posting as 'Desiree Hill' and making a fool out of her trailer dwelling self. I think all of the comments were deleted, but I have the screenshots. Someone ('murray is a hero'?) kept responding to her as 'Slobine Faustin'. LOL.
"I should mention that I find it incredibly sad that anyone would want to spend Christmas thinking about my website."
Evidently Lynette spent hers on topix all day. (click me)
It's almost too sad to be funny. I guess because it was so dead there yesterday, she eventually started making up quotes from people she didn't like, and then responded to them. It must have been a fun holiday at the Anderson double-wide!!
You know, this is all so sick. WTF is wrong with these people? How does cyberstalking, bullying, harassing, or imitation, help make Michael Jackson not be a pedophile?
F'LOONS IT WILL NOT CHANGE THE IRREFUTABLE FACTS.
And for middle aged women, esp. women in their damn 50s, to imitate a college student that they don't even know just because she is putting out the fruits of her research that prove that Michael Jackson wasn't the innocent savior of children and was instead a molester of children, is absolutely and morally fucked up. what is wrong with that trailer trash? Their pathetic lives are so wrapped up in a damn child molester that they have never even met. It's a religion. I always think those that follow and worship celebrities have lower IQs than those that don't. I haven't been proven wrong yet.
By the way, I think it's sad that Desiree gets the blame for any and all dissenters because these two elderly f'loons have a few screws loose. It's pretty obvious that there are way more people that think that Wacko Jacko is guilty than the owner of this blog and MJ Facts. Frenchie you showed your picture and I doubt they will believe it.
"By the way, I think it's sad that Desiree gets the blame for any and all dissenters because these two elderly f'loons have a few screws loose."
Well, I think it's only Sabine Faustin of Brooklyn New York, Lynette Anderson of Bemidji Minnesota, and the Transylvanian who actually believe the 'Everyone's Desiree Conspiracy'. It's really not surprising. All three seem like the sort of mouth-breathers that believe the government and/or aliens secretly monitor them through their television sets.
I bet this was the comment that set Sabine off. We all know that our dear Ms. Faustin's paper-thin ego makes it impossible for her to deal with criticism in a healthy way.
Post a Comment