If one was to come onto this blog and go through the Archives, one would see that I have an affection for Our Dear Michael. That's a reasonable conclusion, I know.
However, one would also be able to see the slow evolution of a conscious mind.
I have tried very hard to ignore this fool's sins because of that aforementioned 'affection'. Now, I won't even bother, as my 'Re: Michael's sexuality' posts and other related entries have shown (yes, I'm slow on the upkeep of this blog but I've been doing other things; forgive me).
I don't care if I seem like a 'hater'.
Some interesting things have come to my attention recently and got me to thinking along that fun Michael Jackson tangent. Yes, the tangent that would make me seem like a 'hater'.
Yesterday afternoon, a reader emailed me with some information about Michael's children (thanks, Susana!). No, not about any of his alleged children, like Omer Bhatti, Donte Jackson, or Prince Michael Malachi Jet Jackson (let's get real: Michael Jackson did not like women enough to father children in the 'normal way'), but his actual children Prince, Paris, and Blanket.
Or are they his actual children?
She linked me to a thread (on the lustrous Lipstick Alley, no doubt) about Tom Mesereau--Michael's attorney for his 2005 trial who, through cunning and skill, saved him from the steel bars of a prison cell--discussing something or another about Michael.
He's done this frequently since Michael's death, sort of killing his credibility in my most humblest of opinions; he's coming off more as a fan than a professional. Tragic.
Anyway, the thread (you can read it here) claims that Mesereau 'confirmed' the identity of Michael's children in a video interview (you can watch the video here), saying Michael had 'two white children and a Hispanic'.
I have TWICE posted entries regarding the paternity of Michael's children, and I really thought this was the last time this whole thing needed to be discussed. But, apparently, there still exists disbelievers. So, let me 'break it down' once again for the skeptics:
As I posted here, it has already been stated by a legitimate source that Michael Jackson is the father of Paris and Prince Jackson (the most 'questionable' of the three, I believe). When I say 'legitimate', I mean Debbie Rowe's divorce attorney and longtime friend, Iris Finsilver. Since I know most people will not click the link to that post to see her quote on Larry King Live back in July 2009 for themselves, I will paste what she said on the show in this entry:
KING: With all the rumors swirling around, did she ever tell you that Michael wasn't the father?FINSILVER: I know that Michael was the father.KING: Was the father.FINSILVER: One hundred percent, Michael is the father of those two children. Yes.
Yes, like I said: it's already been attested to. But let me explain.
Why does Iris Finsilver have more legitimacy than Tom Mesereau in the discussion of Michael's children? It is because, as Debbie's attorney regarding custody disputes with Michael, she was privy to knowledge of paternity. Mesereau, on the other hand, was merely Michael's criminal lawyer, and I highly doubt he bogarted Michael with questions of his children's biology.
It was just not important in terms of the issues at hand: yet another--really, it was inevitable--child molestation accusation.
Also, Mesereau--like many people, obviously--based his assumptions (yes, they are assumptions) about Prince, Paris, and Blanket's races because of their skin color.
So, not hard science or a DNA test, but his fallible eyes.
For individuals who especially live in the United States, we should all know you cannot base race or ethnicity off skin color; that is faulty and can be inaccurate.
There seems to be this sort of dogma that there is no way Michael could have had three children and none of them 'look black'. Well, let me attempt to explain that one, too, although I must admit this may enter that grey area of 'speculation'.
Here's my theory:
Here's my theory: