Diane Dimond--I have to admit--has this tangible hatred for Michael.
I've seen her on TV and, although I do agree with her on some points she makes, there is something 'odd' about her longing to expose Michael as a pedophile. Alleged pedophile, I mean.
So I found this video!
Diane looks evil, in my opinion.
Best thing as well, it shows Bob Jones and Victor Gutierrez, author of Michael Jackson Was My Lover, which is a highly entertaining, slash fanfiction, with real documents thrown in for good measure. Gutierrez was being interviewed in a parked car at night!
If you haven't read Michael Jackson Was My Lover, you are missing out. I think they are actually selling copies of that gem on Amazon.com for a reasonable $150 price tag; I paid more, as I have two copies. That book, in a nutshell, was written by a pedophile (Gutierrez) for pedophiles.
You'll have to trust me on this. I'll discuss all about that book in a blog entry coming soon.
But back to the video...
Diane says within that Michael and Jordie Chandler were nuzzling and petting at the World Music Awards in Monaco, saying he was bouncing Jordie in his lap and repeating 'Rubba, Rubba'.
First of all, seeing that Diane covered the trial for Court TV back in 2005, she should know 'Rubba' was not a sexual name Michael used to call his 'special friends' he would 'rub against'; the transcripts reveal it was short for 'Rubberhead'.
I doubt he was 'rubbing against' Frank Dileo!
I doubt he was 'rubbing against' Frank Dileo!
Here's a video of Michael and Jordie at the awards show:
Looks fairly innocuous, doesn't it? Makes Diane Dimond look like a liar, right?
But according to reports, the tiny country of Monaco was abuzz with the conduct of Michael with Jordie! What that video shows is merely what the camera saw, not what the audience witnessed. From Christopher Anderson's fabulous biography Michael Jackson: Unauthorized, pages 289 and 290:
Maybe Diane Dimond is 'evil'--a 'demon'--but she could've very well been accurate.
Of course, we don't know about the alleged 'hair-licking'. I don't believe it; that just seems like a silly concoction from someone's head...
It was also alleged that they were 'late' to the show; the video of the awards ceremony above shows they arrived and went straight in, so it's possible it was due to tardiness. Our good friend Victor Gutierrez alleges it was because of some sexual activity.
WARNING: the following is very graphic! Reader beware!
From page 52 of Michael Jackson Was My Lover:
Well, they are dead wrong and most likely have never read the book (which is a common theme, let me tell you).
So, what really happened in Monaco?
Well, apparently, it cost Michael between $15.3 and $25 million.
When Michael introduced his friends [the Chandlers: June, Jordie, and Lily] to Prince Albert and Princesses Caroline and Stephanie, "it was as if he were introducing his own family.... It seemed very odd." But not as odd as what transpired at the awards ceremony itself....
...Joey Randall [Jordie Chandler] sat in his [Michael's] lap, giggling as Michael cuddled, stroked, and nuzzled the boy without restraint. One observer watched in amazement as Michael reportedly ran his hand up and down the boy's leg.
The two were dressed identically in black outfits and red armbands, matching black hats, and mirrored sunglasses....it appeared the boy was no more than nine. Had they [those in attendance] known he was thirteen, the reaction would probably have been stronger. "It was really very shocking," said British journalist Piers Morgan, who sat just a few yards from Jackson. "Monaco was talking about it for days."
Observed journalist Morgan, who followed Michael and his friends around Monaco for five days: "He could hardly take his hands off Joey [Jordie].... I found the whole thing extremely uncomfortable."So, what we see in the clip above may not have been the whole story.
Maybe Diane Dimond is 'evil'--a 'demon'--but she could've very well been accurate.
Of course, we don't know about the alleged 'hair-licking'. I don't believe it; that just seems like a silly concoction from someone's head...
It was also alleged that they were 'late' to the show; the video of the awards ceremony above shows they arrived and went straight in, so it's possible it was due to tardiness. Our good friend Victor Gutierrez alleges it was because of some sexual activity.
WARNING: the following is very graphic! Reader beware!
From page 52 of Michael Jackson Was My Lover:
Jordie dressed in the same type of uniform as Jackson. Jackson approached him, kissed him on the lips, and told him that he would like to make love. Jordie responded by telling him that they would arrive late to the presentation. Michael insisted that it would be quick, and sat Jordie on the bed and began to lower his pants. Jordie opened his legs and Michael began to suck his penis until the boy ejaculated. Then Jordie, half dressed in the bed, watched as Michael masturbated in front of him.Now I don't know if any of the above is true but that long quote reminds me of how important it is to discuss Gutierrez's book. Some fans erroneously assume it was written by Evan Chandler, Jordie's father and possible extortioner of Michael Jackson.
Well, they are dead wrong and most likely have never read the book (which is a common theme, let me tell you).
So, what really happened in Monaco?
Well, apparently, it cost Michael between $15.3 and $25 million.

4 comments:
The most expensive book I could find on Michael was: "Michael Jackson" by Richard Horwich...
"Book Description: Gallery Books, 1984., NY:, 1984. HC. First Edition, hardcover, illustrated with color photographs. INSCRIBED by Michael Jackson with notation: "One of my favorite books!". Bump to one corner, some minor edge wear, still a very good copy with clean contents and solid binding."
It would take a superfan to shell out the almost $5000 price tag.
I recently read an interview with a grown up Corey Feldman. He was asked if he had been in touch with Michael recently and responded that Michael ignored him. This sounds very similar to the way men start ducking women after they get what they want out of them. Michael loved dressing Corey up in an outfit to match his, and then doing moonwalks in front of the mirror. When Corey grew too old to fit Michael's type, he dropped him like a hot potato. If Michael is a molester I can't say that I blame him. Corey loves to talk and any post-coitus conversation must not have been worth all that trouble.
LOL...
What article was that you read with Coery Feldman? I mean, what year was it? Post-Michael's death?
The funny thing is Michael's ritualistic behaviors, you know? I think the dressing up of 'special friends' is one of his MOs, like the 'sleepovers'. I really think he gets some kind of psycho-sexual kick out of the children wearing the Mini-Michael outfits, like Jordie Chandler did in the above picture closing the entry.
I mean you can say it's narcissism but I think that's only half the story. It could be a grooming technique.
The way Michael went through kids is sickening. There was a British boy named Terry George who Michael used to talk to on the phone long-distance. 'Allegedly', Michael was masturbating on the phone while chatting with this kid. The guy is gay now, for the record. Anyway, when Terry hit 17 Michael flat out dissed him, saying 'You've changed.'
Corey said he wasn't molested so I believe him. But Michael gets sick of the kids, it's true.
Why do I get this odd, odd feeling you are mocking me? You mockin' me, Hirsch?
X-D
Really...
I did manage to read Gutierrez's book and found it to be utterly scandalous. Also where did he get all those highly personal info especially Jordie's bank account details? could Jordie himself be the supplier of the documents? Also the chapter which featured Brett Barnes was quite a revelation. I am sure that Brett was only 14 or 15 when this book was published. The Barnes family must have been aware of the book and the possibility of their inclusion especially as they were twice interviewed by the authorities in 1993. It concerned me that they did not sue Gutierrez and took steps to ensure that his name and dignity was protected. Although I only believe 90% of it, I am positive that Gutierrez embellished some parts for shock effect. I do not believe the chapter on tampons and enemas. How would he be able to perform all those energetic routines on stage if he had such a personal problem?
I read Gutierrez's book when I thought Michael hadn't done any wrong to any young boy and I, too, found it to be, as you've said, UTTERLY SCANDALOUS!
And it is still utterly scandalous now that I have switched my opinions.
I believe Victor Gutierrez is a pedophile, and, since he is a pedophile, he wrote the book as a love story. He portrayed, as you've read, Evan Chandler as some monster who was hellbent on destroying a 'beautiful love affair' between Michael and Jordie. *rolls eyes* It's all nonsense.
The bit that I pasted in the entry is just one of the many explicit and lurid details in Gutierrez's book. I really think he wanted to entertain the NAMBLA crowd! I'm sorry: I am really convinced Victor was a pedophile or, at least, a pedophile sympathizer!
Anyway, I think Gutierrez got the documents from Diane Dimond or people in the police department/attorney's office who were itching to get the 'truth' out, you know? Gutierrez fancies himself an investigative journalist (and not a Romance writer, LOL) and I think the reportage within is pretty solid.
As for Brett Barnes, that's an interesting thing. It would seem that they would want to protect his reputation if all of the 'lies' about him weren't true. The silence of these people speaks volumes; they are unaware of that!
Michael sued Gutierrez over an alleged tape Gutierrez claimed to have seen which depicted Michael having sex with a young boy; he sued Gutierrez, Hard Copy, Diane Dimond, and Universal (I believe) for slander/libel over an alleged 'red hot probe' the DA/police dept. had against Michael. It was never for Gutierrez's book. Allegedly, Michael got all of his people to buy all of the copies of MJWML off the shelves. Hence it's hefty price tag in the US.
You know, I actually believe some the more outlandish claims in MJWML, such as enemas and tampons. Some men use enemas filled with warm liquids for sexual pleasure so it's not really a shock to me, esp. since I believe Michael was gay. I don't know if he was shitting on himself, you know, but I am of the opinion that sometimes if it sounds really crazy--so crazy you cannot imagine anyone making it up--it's probably true.
Fact is stranger than fiction, as the old adage says.
The same goes for the claims that Michael drank Enfamil out of bottles. I think Blanca Francia was quoted as saying this, and she was very much liked by Michael and left his employ on her own volition. I don't think she is a liar at all. She actually spoke with police before ever talking to the tabloid press, unlike the others.
So what I'm saying is, yes, I agree Gutierrez definitely made up things in that book. Really, the guy's a sicko. But its a solid book worth owning, IMO.
Oh, but there was a claim by the Neverland 5 within the book that Michael abused his lion who had 'scared' Brett Barnes and they pelted the creature with rocks until it bled. They also alleged they found small skeletons on the property when they had to 'bury' a dead giraffe.
I may be breaking my above mentioned rule but I don't think any of that's true. I think Michael really loved animals and I don't think he wanted to ever hurt them. They were just trying to make him look esp. evil, in terms of hurting innocent creatures like animals.
Wade Robson did however testify that they threw really tiny pebbles at the lion to get it to roar but that's pretty innocuous. I sometimes throw wetted wads of paper towels at my dog, LOL.
Post a Comment